First and foremost, I want to thank the Lamoni Chronicle for having me back, to give a specific perspective of millions of American people, like me, who are not given the same equal platform in most papers across this country; for that, I salute the Chronicle.
To be clear, what you are about to read is the same opinion of millions of Americans, who are ridiculed, attacked, black balled, belittled and outright bullied into submission and silence.
In the 1970s scientists said, Global Cooling? Yup, nope, dang it! Then in the 1990s they said, Let’s try Global Warming? Yup, nope, dang it! So finally, in the 2000s they are saying, Okay fine, lets cover all our bases by calling it Climate Change to defer away from the actual Climate Variability aspect of the science itself. Yes! No one can claim there is no climate change! If they do, then we can call them crazy, and label them out of any serious credibility. Ha! Finally, we’ve got them!
Now, of course, I am being expansively tongue and cheek in this portrayal of how they manipulate to control the narrative, as if there is really a “they”. Or, am I?
In 1988 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established, it was chartered by the United Nations. The same UN that was NOT designed to be the authority of the United States of America nor our sovereignty. The same UN that passed “their” resolution 3379, which called the act of Israel defending their country, a form of racism. (https://ecf.org.il/issues/issue/1320) It took 9/11 to finally get power within the UN to repeal it. The same UN, whose Human Rights Council was assessed by the US Ambassador as, “So Corrupt” and reported by the New York Times. (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/29/world/nikki-haley-un-human-rights-council-corrupt.html ) The same UN that continues to attempt and force agenda 21 and it’s sustainable yoke on the necks of sovereign citizens.
Two points of fact about the UN’s IPCC: 1. It was “created to provide policy makers with regular scientific assessments on climate change, its implications and potential future risks, as well as to put forward adaptation and mitigation options.” (https://www.ipcc.ch) (note “policy makers”) 2. The IPCC does NOT conduct its own research. The research is chosen by the same UN we all know is full of corruption, and continued focused patterns that challenge the sovereignty of nations. So like any political platform, the UN is no different in corruption than Washington D.C., like this fiasco we all hear now as the Mueller Investigation. It is no different politics at state or local levels, it is the nature of the beast.
If you think that all reputable scientists’ data is taken unbiasedly by the IPCC, it is simply not the case. In fact, to get around this, they (the IPCC) takes 31 of 32 multiple nation-sponsored computer programs that “Parameterize” the forecasted data of the warming of the atmosphere. (Parameterize?) Out of these 32 collective parameterized computer coded programs, only 1 of them is consistently accurate to the actual data studied year after year. Every year it shows that we are not in a global warming crisis at all, only heating up by minimal percentages, which is the reality of the data. The surface temperature of the Earth is only about 9/10ths of a degree C warmer than it was 100 years ago. No one is denying this, no republican, no tea party minded, or constitutional conservative is debating it AT ALL, we are NOT denying the SCIENCE as the left portrays, only the paid scientist who don’t know what is actually causing this minimal planet warming and coding programs that far exceeds the threat. Then we have manipulators like Al Gore, who predicted that 12 years from 2006 there would be world catastrophe, but all 10 of his predictions in his movie did not happen, and 2018 came and went, and now NY D Cortez is saying .”…The world is going to end in 12 years, if we don’t address climate change…” going off of the again fudged predictions of IPCC report.
The UN is manipulating the reporting to be worse than it actually is, they take the 31 consensus programs and push that scare to control global political outcomes. While allowing the hard extreme leftists to demonize and discredit good honorable scientists who disagree with the tactics of the IPCC, and the reporting of it by the media, but not the science itself. “Hoax”? To be clear, hoax is not saying topic is false, but tweaks to trick from reality of it. All the folks I know, believe the theory is right, but somehow know that things like “Parameterizing” = the fudging of data by scientist that are being paid to find particular outcomes vs. being unbiased to the scientific data itself, as scientist ought to be. So it seems, that out of 32 programs, only one is adhering to the unbiased protocol. This is the problem millions of Americans see. Good scientists are demonized consistently, like the one I used as a resource for most of my knowledge on this subject, Dr. Patrick Michaels.
Dr. Michaels is the Director of the Study of Science at CATO Institute. He has both his AB and SM degrees in Biology, Sciences, and Plant Ecology from the University of Chicago, a PHD in Ecological Climatology from University of Wisconsin-Madison, he is the past President of the American Association of State Climatologists, is currently the Program Chairman of Committee and Applied Climatology of the American Meteorological Society, and has also been the Research Professor of Environmental Sciences for over 30 years at the University of Virginia, and if that is not enough, he is also a scientific Contributing Author and Reviewer at the United Nations IPCC. He knows what he is talking about, just like thousands of others. (https://books.google.com/books/about/Climate_of_Extremes.html?id=lWQdP4_7SycC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button#v=onepage&q&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=vO2ppGUrkEgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Climate+Coup:+Global+Warming%27s+Invasion+of+Our+Government+and+Our+Lives&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjOrceQ6ZHiAhUHZKwKHS9QDtwQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=Climate%20Coup%3A%20Global%20Warming’s%20Invasion%20of%20Our%20Government%20and%20Our%20Lives&f=false)
For the record, we know of 31,487 American scientists alone, who are publicly trying to fight these manipulations to demonstrate that the claim of “settled science” and an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human caused global warming and consequent climatological damage is WRONG. That is 3,805 Atmosphere, Earth, and Environment American scientists, 935 Computer and Math American scientists, 5,812 Physics and Aerospace American scientists, 4,822 Chemistry American scientists, 2,965 Biochemistry, Biology and Agriculture American scientists, 3,046 Medicine American scientists, 10,102 General Engineering and General Science American scientists. All fighting to expose the “hoax”. (http://www.petitionproject.org/signers_by_last_name.php?run=A)
Finally, I’ll end with this, “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess.” Nobel Prize winner Ronald Coase 1981
“Charlie Mike” (Continue the Mission)